Former Idaho lawmaker found responsible of raping intern
Warning: Undefined variable $post_id in /home/webpages/lima-city/booktips/wordpress_de-2022-03-17-33f52d/wp-content/themes/fast-press/single.php on line 26

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A former Idaho lawmaker was convicted Friday of raping a 19-year-old legislative intern after a dramatic trial during which the younger girl fled the witness stand throughout testimony, saying “I can’t do this.”
The intern told a Statehouse supervisor that Aaron von Ehlinger raped her at his apartment after the 2 had dinner at a Boise restaurant in March 2021. Von Ehlinger stated the sex was consensual.
On the time, the Lewiston Republican was serving as a state consultant, but he later resigned.
Von Ehlinger, 39, was discovered responsible Friday of rape. He was found not guilty of sexual penetration with a international object.
Von Ehlinger sat calmly as the verdict was read, as he has throughout the trial.
Afterward, 4th District Judge Michael Reardon informed the jury: “This has been an unusual case attended by many unexpected circumstances, however I admire your attention ... and arduous work.”
A felony rape conviction carries a minimum sentence of 1 year in jail in Idaho. The maximum penalty might be as excessive as life in prison, on the decide’s discretion. Sentencing has been scheduled for July 28.
As von Ehlinger was remanded into custody and handcuffed, he talked quietly together with his attorney who eliminated objects from von Ehlinger’s pockets.
The prosecution remained stoic as they left the courtroom, but as soon as they reached a lower flooring they stopped to briefly to congratulate one another on the decision.
Von Ehlinger’s lawyer, Jon Cox, could not be immediately reached for remark after the trial.
The Related Press typically does not determine people who say they've been sexually assaulted, and has referred to the girl in this case as “Jane Doe” at her request.
In a press convention, Ada County Prosecuting Attorney Jan Bennetts thanked the jury, investigators and the prosecutors who dealt with the case.
“Last however not least, it took an incredible amount of courage for the victim in this case, Jane Doe, to return ahead,” Bennetts mentioned. “I wish to acknowledge the braveness that she took in coming forward.”
Doe testified on the second day of the trial. She haltingly described the moments the alleged assault started, before abruptly leaving the witness stand.
“He tried to put his fingers between my legs and I closed my knees,” Doe said.
At that, she stood up.
“I can’t do this,” she stated, quickly strolling out of the courtroom.
The choose gave the prosecuting attorneys 10 minutes to seek out her to find out if she would return and resume her testimony.
When she did not, the choose told the jurors they had to “strike (Doe’s testimony) from your minds as if it never occurred,” as a result of the protection couldn't cross-examine her.
Through the press convention, Deputy Prosecuting Legal professional Katelyn Farley mentioned the moment Doe left the trial was “heart-wrenching,” however stated she and deputy prosecutor Whitney Welsh had ready for trial knowing that Doe might not be capable of testify.
“I feel it’s vital that she decided to stroll within the room, and she or he also decided to stroll out — those have been her choices,” Welsh stated.
During his testimony Thursday, von Ehlinger typically spoke in a transparent, loud voice on to jurors, saying he and Doe decided to return to his house to “hang out” after eating at a elaborate Boise restaurant. Then they began making out on the couch, he mentioned.
“Issues were going properly, and I requested (Doe) if she want to move to the bed room,” von Ehlinger mentioned. “She stated ‘Certain.’ We received up, held palms and walked into the bed room.”
Deliberations stretched for seven hours till practically 8 p.m. Thursday before the jury determined to interrupt for the evening. At one level, the choose summoned the attorneys to his chambers as a result of the jury asked a question. No details had been made public about the jury’s inquiry.
When the allegations grew to become public — largely because of the legislative ethics investigation — Doe faced unrelenting harassment from a few of von Ehlinger’s supporters. Her title, photograph and private particulars about her life had been repeatedly publicized in “doxxing” incidents. One of many people who incessantly harassed her was within the courthouse to attend the trial, however regulation enforcement banned the person from the ground the place the case was being heard.
Throughout closing arguments, Farley informed jurors that the case was about “energy in the unsuitable fingers” used to the “nice devastation” of Doe. Von Ehlinger had social, political and physical energy over the petite intern, Farley said.
“He used that power to rape and forcibly penetrate her,” Farley mentioned, pointing at von Ehlinger. Doe resisted in a number of methods, she stated, highlighting the testimony of regulation enforcement investigators and a nurse sexual assault examiner who interviewed Doe after the alleged assault.
“Words show lack of consent. Excuses of ‘Why this shouldn’t happen’ present lack of consent. Yanking your head again and getting an harm exhibits lack of consent,” Farley said.
But von Ehlinger’s attorney instructed jurors the prosecution’s case was made up of “purple herrings,” and mentioned von Ehlinger was a credible one who willingly took the stand to share his facet of the story.
The investigators and the nurse who carried out the sexual assault examination testified earlier this week. They stated Doe reported being pinned down whereas von Ehlinger compelled her to carry out oral intercourse, and that she knew he continuously carried a handgun and had placed it on a dresser near the bed on the time of the assault. The nurse also testified that Doe had a “goose egg” on the again of her head from putting the wall or a headboard while attempting to jerk her head away from von Ehlinger’s grip.